[PLUG] OO.o vs. LO

[MJang]

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 16:38 -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Joe Shisei Niski wrote:
> 
> > The compatibility with MS Office 2007 .docx and .xlsx files is all but
> > nonexistent, and the presentation program still chokes on the simplest
> > PowerPoint files. It's not business-class interoperable with MS Office.
> 
> Joe,
> 
>    That's interesting. What I read in the comparison is that LO has better
> support for M$, particularly the newer versions.

I haven't converted yet, but gather third-hand that many of the original
OOo developers have moved to LO. So longer term, I'd expect LO to exceed
the quality of OOo.

Thanks,
Mike